I can accept the fact that our politicians are imperfect human beings, just like the rest of us. Sometimes, because politics is what it is, our politicians exaggerate their own successes and downplay their failures and weaknesses, just like the rest of us. That is just the nature of being human.
But don’t we have a right and obligation to expect those who serve us in public office to rise above these tendencies and serve as moral examples to the rest of us?
When we were adolescents didn’t our parents, our schools and our churches teach us that our lives would be better if we told the truth? That shaming someone by name-calling is hurtful and demeaning? That sharing is better than being greedy and self-serving?
Didn’t we learn this as children? And when we became adults, didn’t we realize that our lives would be better, and happier, if we practiced these behaviors? Oh, this doesn’t mean that we don’t mess up now and then, but we try to do our best to be examples of what we have been taught.
What is the long term effect of honoring a candidate whose reputation as a liar is well documented, and who responds to criticism with name calling and putdowns, instead of responding as a responsible adult? How do we justify supporting a candidate whose moral life includes a conviction for rape and a history of adultery?
What message are we sending to our children if we expect them to tell the truth and encourage them to treat others with respect, but then speak well of, or vote for, a candidate who doesn’t.
